Machineryline » Reviews » Material handling equipment » JCB »

Reviews Material handling equipment JCB

4.3

Average score of JCB

50 reviews

4.1

4.1 Price

4.4

4.4 Reliability

4.3

4.3 Maintenance

4.4

4.4 Operation

4.2

4.2 Convenience

Search results: 50 reviews

Filter

Add a review

4.6

Telehandler JCB 535-95

2018 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

I’ve been operating the JCB 535-95 for about two years now. The 9-meter boom gives it that extra reach, which can come in handy for stacking high loads. What really stands out to me is the quick attachment system-it saves so much time when switching tools. While the comfort in the cabin is generally good, extended hours can sometimes feel a bit tiring. Overall, I think it performs well for its class.

4.4

Forklift JCB 531-70

2017 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

I've operated the JCB 531-70 over the past season, and it's proven to be a capable telehandler. The gearbox is responsive, making handling smooth even with heavier loads. However, when speaking of the cab design, it could use an update; it lacks the comfort and ergonomics seen in newer competitors. Despite a few minor gripes, it's been reliable for daily operations.

4.2

Telehandler JCB 535-95

2019 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Having operated the JCB 535-95 for several projects, I find its 9.5-meter lifting reach and 3.5-ton capacity quite impressive. The view from the cabin is unobstructed, facilitating precise handling. However, during extended usage, the hydraulic cylinders require frequent checks. Maintenance appears straightforward thanks to accessible compartments.

4.0

Telehandler JCB 533-105

2017 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Recently, I rented the JCB 533-105 for a series of agricultural tasks. The load capacity of 3300kg managed my requirements well, and the pneumatic tires provided decent traction on wet soil. The fuel consumption seemed reasonable given its 148-liter tank capacity. I appreciated the cab's comfort, though I did notice vibrations at higher operational speeds. The machine fulfills its designed purposes effectively, with a couple of areas for improvement.

3.8

Forklift JCB 541-70

2016 Year

3.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Got my hands on the JCB 541-70 a while ago, mainly for some heavy-duty tasks on the farm. It's been good overall. Handling is fairly straightforward, although the controls took me a session to get used to. The price was a bit higher than I'd have liked, given its age, but you get what you pay for. Maintenance-wise, some initial fixes were necessary, but since then it's been keeping up decently. Comfort during operation is adequate for the tasks it takes on.

4.0

Telehandler JCB 535-140

2018 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

I have a 2018 JCB 535-140 that I have been using for about 2 years now. Overall, the machine works steadily, but during this time I had to replace a number of parts. For example, I replaced the clutch after 1.5 years of use, as well as the pressure sensor. I also updated the oil and filters in the engine and hydraulic system according to the scheduled maintenance. The loader's technical specifications are in line with the stated ones, the machine is able to handle most of the tasks given.

4.8

Telehandler JCB 535-125

2019 Year

5.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

I am the owner of a 2019 JCB 535-125 machine for 2 years now and during this time I have found it to be one of the best telescopic handlers on the market. Despite intensive use, practically all major components and assemblies are in perfect condition. The only part that had to be replaced was the hydraulic coupling after 1.5 years of operation. All other elements, including the transmission and engine, work like clockwork.

4.6

Telehandler JCB 535-95

2018 Year

4.0 Price

5.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

5.0 Operation

5.0 Convenience

I purchased the JCB 535-95 Agri in 2018 and am satisfied with this purchase. Over 4 seasons of intensive use, I only had to replace the brake pads - everything else is in excellent condition. The reliable engine, transmission, and hydraulics work flawlessly. It starts easily even in freezing temperatures, and its maneuverability allows it to handle any task. The JCB 535-95 Agri justifies every penny invested, I recommend it to anyone looking for a quality and durable telescopic handler.

3.8

Forklift JCB 541-70

2015 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

4.0 Maintenance

3.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

Been using the JCB 541-70 now and it's serving its purpose for our operations. I noticed the reliability to be solid; it hasn't let me down during critical tasks. However, I found one or two areas that could use improvement in handling precision. Servicing it has been manageable though, which is a plus. The convenience features also add to the overall ease of operation, especially considering the scope of work it's designed for.

4.2

Forklift JCB 535-95

2014 Year

4.0 Price

4.0 Reliability

5.0 Maintenance

4.0 Operation

4.0 Convenience

I’ve worked with a bunch of loaders, hopped in a 535-95 lately after all the touch-ups the owner bragged about. They really went through everything - swapped out all the window glass, replaced steering parts, checked the diffs and changed seals. No leaks anywhere, which is rare for these old units.

Controls aren’t as fun as a joystick setup but you get used to the levers. Brakes and acceleration react quick so moving loads isn’t stressful, though the cab isn’t the roomiest. The condition of the extendable boom surprised me - hardly any wiggle, decent welds. Radio actually works!

Only thing bugging me, the fuel system was fully redone, but you never really know how that'll wear over a few thousand more hours. For now though it’s all good. Didn’t find any real cracks in the paint after some rough site work, so guess the facelift stuck. Wouldn’t mind a plusher seat, but whatever, you don’t buy these for luxury.